seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and apply Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It truly is important for society to understand the gravity of this offense and the need for stringent punishment to discourage probable offenders and ensure justice for your victims and their families.
Life imprisonment is undoubtedly an alternative to the death penalty. In this sort of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life powering bars.
In the dynamic realm of legal statutes, amendments Perform a vital role in adapting to evolving circumstances and strengthening the legal framework. A person these kinds of notable amendment that has garnered attention is definitely the latest revision of Section 489-File in the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety days for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided from the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
Section 302 with the PPC deals with one of several most significant offenses in criminal legislation: murder. In this blog post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, examine the punishment it entails, and examine some notable case laws related to this particular section.
be set up without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is usually a horrifying reality, an especially small threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
There are innumerable instances where death was never intended – even more where These nominated inside the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is really a tragic event. Nevertheless the death of any residing being is no considerably less a tragic event.
This system, to be used by members in the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a possible fine.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition into the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Growth Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter like a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) in the Pakistan Constitution presents unique jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and likely hazard to local residents. In the end, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, though observing the general craze supports that electromagnetic fields have unfavorable effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out in the 1992 Rio Declaration to the Environment and Improvement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with here human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used like a reason to prevent environmental degradation.